“The result is more than the creation of a new quantum state. It is a demonstration of a new method for engineering interactions that were previously out of reach,” said Dr. Oana Băzăvan, lead author from the Department of Physics, University of Oxford.
“The fourth-order quadsqueezing interaction was generated more than 100 times faster than expected using conventional approaches. This makes effects that were previously out of reach accessible in practice,” Băzăvan added.
Physicists have long used a trick called “squeezing” to sharpen the fuzzy measurements of the subatomic world. It is why gravitational-wave detectors, like LIGO, can hear black holes colliding across the universe. But for all its utility, ordinary squeezing is a relatively simple, second-order effect.
Everything we know about the shape of the Universe could be completely wrong.
This is one of the most fascinating unsolved problems in cosmology, and it almost never gets talked about outside of research papers. It’s called the curvature tension, and it links in to the \.
Is there a quantum reason we could have free will? Neil deGrasse Tyson and comedian Chuck Nice explore the concept of free will and predetermination with neuroscientist, biologist, and author of Determined: The Science of Life Without Free Will, Robert Sapolsky.
A special thanks from our editors to Robert Sapolsky’s dog.
Could we put an end to the question of whether or not we have free will? Discover “The Hungry Judge Effect” and how little bits of biology affect our actions. We break down a physicist’s perspective of free will, The Big Bang, and chaos theory. Is it enough to just feel like we have free will? Why is it an issue to think you have free will if you don’t?
We discuss the difference between free will in big decisions versus everyday decisions. How do you turn out to be the type of person who chooses vanilla ice cream over strawberry? We explore how quantum physics and virtual particles factor into predetermination. Could quantum randomness change the actions of an atom? How can society best account for a lack of free will? Are people still responsible for their actions?
What would Chuck do if he could do anything he wanted? We also discuss the benefits of a society that acknowledges powers outside of our control and scientific advancements made. How is meritocracy impacted by free will? Plus, can you change if people believe in free will if they have no free will in believing so?
Thanks to our Patrons Pro Handyman, Brad K. Daniels, Starman, Stephen Somers, Nina Kane, Paul Applegate, and David Goldberg for supporting us this week.
A century after their discovery, cosmic rays—particles of extreme energy originating from the far reaches of the universe—remain a mystery to scientists. The DAMPE (Dark Matter Particle Explorer) space telescope is tackling this phenomenon, particularly investigating the role that dark matter may play in their formation. This international mission, which includes the University of Geneva (UNIGE), has made a major breakthrough by highlighting a universal feature of these particles. The results are published in the journal Nature.
Cosmic rays are the most energetic particles observed in the universe, far surpassing the energies of particles produced by man-made accelerators on Earth. Their exact origin is still under study, and it is believed that they originate from extreme astrophysical phenomena, such as supernovae, black hole jets, or pulsars.
The DAMPE space telescope, launched in December 2015, aims to provide answers regarding the origin and nature of these cosmic rays. This space mission, with the astrophysics group from the Department of Nuclear and Particle Physics (DPNC) at the University of Geneva (UNIGE) being one of its main contributors, has made a crucial breakthrough. Through the analysis of high-precision measurements collected by the telescope, scientists have identified a universal feature in the energy spectra of primary cosmic ray nuclei, ranging from protons to iron.
Studying the thing you can never step outside of and look back at is the fundamental problem facing every cosmologist who has ever looked up at the night sky. The Universe is not a laboratory you can peer into from above, it’s the thing you are already inside. The only way to truly test your ideas about how it works is to build a copy of it, run the clock forward from the Big Bang, and see if what emerges matches what your telescopes are actually telling you.
That is exactly what the FLAMINGO project has been doing. And this week, its creators made the results available to the entire world.
An international team of astrophysicists, led by researchers at Leiden University in the Netherlands, has released one of the largest cosmological simulation datasets ever produced. The archive contains more than 2.5 petabytes of data (roughly equivalent to half a million high definition films) and is free to access for researchers anywhere on the planet.
A record-breaking 3D map of the universe is now complete, giving scientists a new way to study dark energy. The massive dataset could reveal surprising changes in how the universe is expanding.
The biggest news in cosmology in recent years is that the mysterious universe-accelerating entity we call dark energy may be fading away. The evidence for this is now strong enough that enormous effort is going into confirming this result. So what’s it going to take, and when are we going to know?
Sign Up on Patreon to get access to the Patreon Livestream with Looking Glass Universe! / pbsspacetime / lookingglassuniverse.
Sign Up on Patreon to get access to the Space Time Discord! / pbsspacetime.
Reality has cracks in it. Universe-spanning filaments of ancient Big Bang energy, formed from topological defects in the quantum fields, aka cosmic strings. They have subatomic thickness but prodigious mass and they lash through space at a close to the speed of light. They could be the most bizarre undiscovered entities that actually exist.
Black holes are mysterious objects, and one theory posits that our universe exists inside of one. It sounds strange, but there’s a surprising argument for it.
🚨 The Biggest Problem in Physics (Cosmological Constant) https://lnkd.in/gt7tEpJw ❓ Problem: Why is the Universe accelerating… and why is the value so unbelievably small? Observations (supernovae, CMB, BAO) show: 👉 The expansion is accelerating 👉 This requires a cosmological constant Λ From Einstein’s equation: Λ = 8πG ρ_Λ 😳 But here’s the crisis: Quantum physics predicts vacuum energy: ρ_vac ≈ M_Pl⁴ But observations give: ρ_Λ ≈ 10⁻¹²⁰ M_Pl⁴ 💥 That’s a mismatch of 120 orders of magnitude This is called the cosmological constant problem 🧠 Standard thinking fails because: We assume: 👉 Energy fills space uniformly 👉 Λ comes from summing quantum fluctuations ρ_vac = (1/V) Σ (½ ℏωₖ) But this diverges → way too large ❌ 💡 A different perspective (EWOG insight): Instead of asking: 👉 “What is the energy of empty space?” Ask: 👉 “What is the geometry of the Universe?
