Toggle light / dark theme

Get the latest international news and world events from around the world.

Log in for authorized contributors

Regulatory mechanisms of PD-1/PD-L1 in cancers

Immune suppression largely contributes to cancer occurrence and progression. The programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1, also known as PDCD1 and CD279) was originally identified by Ishida et al. in apoptotic mouse T-cell tumors [1]. PD-1 is a transmembrane protein belonging to the CD28/CTLA-4 superfamily. It is widely expressed at the surface of activated T cells, B cells, monocytes, and other immune cells, and negatively regulates human immune response through binding with its two ligands, namely programmed cell death 1 ligands (PD-L1 or PD-L2). PD-L1 (B7-H1; CD274) and PD-L2 (B7-DC; CD273) belong to the B7 family of T cell co-inhibitory molecules. PD-L1 is widely expressed in antigen-presenting cells and tissues, such as heart and lung [2, 3]. The interaction of PD-1 with PD-L1 or PD-L2 provides inhibitory signals responsible for inhibiting T cell signaling, mediating the mechanisms of tolerance, and providing immune homeostasis. Therefore, PD-1 suppresses autoimmunity and prevents the occurrence of autoimmune diseases. In addition, PD-L1 or PD-L2 expressed by cancer cells binds to PD-1 on the surface of T cells, thereby inhibiting T cell activation and leading to cancer immune escape [4]. Numerous studies revealed that PD-L1 expression is very high in lung cancer, melanoma, glioma, breast cancer and other malignant tumor cells, forming an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment [5].

PD-1 mainly consists of extracellular IgV-like domain region, hydrophobic transmembrane region and cytoplasmic region, and the tail of the cytoplasmic region has immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif (ITSM) [6, 7], which is an important structural basis for PD-1 to transmit inhibitory signals and perform immunosuppressive functions. PD-L1 is structurally similar to PD-1 and is more conserved and widely expressed than PD-L2 [8], so it plays the leading effect in tumor cells immune evasion. In recent years, antagonistic antibodies against PD-1 or PD-L1 have been approved by the FDA to treat cancer, opening a new chapter in tumor immunotherapy across the era [9].

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have become effective immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and are rapidly becoming the standard therapy for various cancers. Tumor immunotherapy aims to block the activity of inhibitory immune checkpoint proteins and promote T cell activation to achieve anti-tumor immune effects [10]. Owing to their safety and precision, these inhibitors hold significant promise in tumor immunotherapy. Research indicates that the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway plays a crucial role in regulating autoimmunity responses and peripheral tolerance. Notably, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy can effectively block the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway, restore T cell activity, enhance anti-tumor immunity, and then eliminate tumor cells [11, 12]. Therefore, the discovery of multiple immunotherapies, such as PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, has significant clinical implications for tumor-specific immunotherapy.

Plasma-based strategies for systemic rejuvenation: critical perspectives on clinical translation

Experimental models such as heterochronic parabiosis and heterochronic plasma transfer have profoundly advanced our understanding of systemic aging, demonstrating that circulating factors can influence brain, vascular, and immune aging through cell nonautonomous mechanisms. These preclinical models have revealed that both pro-geronic and anti-geronic signals in blood can modulate neuroinflammation, neurovascular health, and cognitive resilience. However, despite their experimental promise, the clinical translation of these findings, particularly through plasma-based interventions in humans, remains fraught with uncertainty.

HRD1 negatively regulates autolysosome formation by inhibiting liquid-liquid phase separation of SNAP29

Qu et al. identify HRD1 as a key negative regulator of autophagosome-lysosome fusion. They demonstrate that HRD1 interacts with the SNARE protein SNAP29 to suppress its liquid-liquid phase separation. This work establishes the regulation of SNARE complex assembly via phase separation as a critical control mechanism for autophagy progression.

Apple’s Next Big Thing Is a Push Into Visual Artificial Intelligence

Apple CEO Tim Cook is signaling that Visual Intelligence will be the defining feature of the company’s push into wearable AI devices. Also: What to expect from Apple’s first product launches of the year during the week of March 2; the iPhone 18 Pro’s color options; and the latest on iOS 26.4.

Last week in Power On: Tesla CarPlay support was held back by the need for wider adoption of iOS 26.

Scientists Grew Mini Brains, Then Trained Them to Solve an Engineering Problem

A few blobs of lab-grown brain tissue have demonstrated a striking proof of concept: living neural circuits can be nudged toward solving a classic control problem through carefully structured feedback.

In a closed-loop system that delivered electrical feedback based on performance, cortical organoids could steadily improve their control of a classic engineering benchmark: balancing an unstable virtual pole.

The improvement is far from a functioning hybrid biocomputer. But as a proof of concept, it shows that neural tissue in a dish can be adaptively tuned through structured feedback – a result that could help researchers probe how neurological disease alters the brain’s capacity for plasticity.

/* */