đŠđș Q: How was Teslaâs FSD supervised launch received in Australia? A: Teslaâs FSD supervised launch in Australia received fair coverage from mainstream media, including a 4.5-minute segment on national news, without Tesla paying for advertising.
đ Q: What are the key features of Teslaâs FSD supervised system? A: Teslaâs FSD supervised system uses cameras and advanced software to autonomously accelerate, brake, and steer, but requires the driver to be responsible and ready to take control at any time.
FSD Safety Concerns.
â ïž Q: What safety issues have been reported with Teslaâs FSD supervised system? A: Teslaâs FSD supervised system has been involved in multiple accidents overseas, but in most cases, the driver was distracted and tried to blame the car, highlighting the need for drivers to take full responsibility.
đșđž Q: What legal challenges has Tesla faced with FSD in the US and Canada? A: Teslaâs FSD supervised system has been slapped with lawsuits in the US and Canada due to multiple crashes, with Tesla stating that in most cases, the driver was distracted and not using the system properly.
However, if youâre rich and you donât like the idea of a limit on computing, you can turn to futurism, longtermism, or âAI optimism,â depending on your favorite flavor. People in these camps believe in developing AI as fast as possible so we can (they claim) keep guardrails in place that will prevent AI from going rogue or becoming evil. (Today, people canât seem toâor donât want toâcontrol whether or not their chatbots become racist, are âsensualâ with children, or induce psychosis in the general population, but sure.)
The goal of these AI boosters is known as artificial general intelligence, or AGI. They theorize, or even hope for, an AI so powerful that it thinks like⊠well⊠a human mind whose ability is enhanced by a billion computers. If someone ever does develop an AGI that surpasses human intelligence, that moment is known as the AI singularity. (There are other, unrelated singularities in physics.) AI optimists want to accelerate the singularity and usher in this âgodlikeâ AGI.
One of the key facts of computer logic is that, if you can slow the processes down enough and look at it in enough detail, you can track and predict every single thing that a program will do. Algorithms (and not the opaque AI kind) guide everything within a computer. Over the decades, experts have written the exact ways information can be sent, one bitâone minuscule electrical zapâat a time through a central processing unit (CPU).
Part 1 of the Singularity Series was âPutting Brakes on the Singularity.â That essay looked at how economic and other non-technical factors will slow down the practical effects of AI, and we should question the supposedly immediate move from AGI to SAI (superintelligent AI).
In part 3, I will consider past singularities, different paces for singularities, and the difference between intelligence and speed accelerations.
In part 4, I will follow up by offering alternative models of AI-driven progress.
According to Einsteinâs theories, the universe started with a Big Bang singularity and is slowly expanding until it disperses into nothingness. But physicists have also come up with theories claiming that the Big Bang was non-singular and can repeat, restarting the cycle over again. These are called âcyclic models,â and theyâve re-emerged into the spotlight now that thereâs mounting evidence that dark energy is weakening over time. However, a physicist from UC Berkeley recently published a paper which he claims âcategorically rules outâ cyclic models. Letâs take a look.
Some scientists now propose that our universe might have been born inside a massive black hole within a larger parent cosmos. In their model, the universe before ours followed the same laws of physics we know today, expanding for billions of years before gravity overcame that outward push. Space began to contract, galaxies moved closer, and the cosmos collapsed toward extreme densities. Instead of ending in a singularity where physics breaks down, quantum effects pushed back against gravity, halting the collapse and triggering a cosmic rebound. That bounce could have launched our own universeâs expansion, making the Big Bang not the true beginning, but a continuation.
This idea draws on the Pauli Exclusion Principle and degeneracy pressure, which in smaller-scale examples prevent white dwarfs and neutron stars from collapsing indefinitely. The same resistance, applied on a universe-wide scale, could stop total collapse inside a black hole. Simulations suggest such a process could occur without invoking exotic new particles or forces. In this framework, the formation of our universe is a purely gravitational event, governed by the physics we already understand, just operating under extreme conditions beyond what we have directly observed.
One striking prediction is that ancient relics from the parent universe could have survived the bounce. These might include primordial black holes or neutron stars that predate our own cosmos. If detected, especially in the early universe, they could serve as evidence that a cosmic bounce occurred. The James Webb Space Telescopeâs discovery of unexpectedly massive galaxies soon after the Big Bang could align with this idea, as such galaxies may have formed more easily if early black holes were already present to seed them.
Recent JWST findings on how galaxies spin across the universe may also fit the model. If confirmed, these patterns could point toward a shared origin and support the possibility that we live inside a black hole. While the concept remains controversial, it offers a potential bridge between general relativity and quantum mechanics, challenging the assumption that singularities are inevitable and suggesting that the life cycle of universes may be far more connected than we thought.
Ever since I first contemplated the profound possibility that our universe might be a kind of simulation, Iâve been consumed by the question: What happens when the simulated begins to simulate? The Simulation Singularity, a central theme in my book The In
Big News! My New Audiobook The Intelligence Supernova is Now Live! đ§ Iâm thrilled to announce the release of the audiobook edition of The Intelligence Supernova: Essays on Cybernetic Transhumanism, the Simulation Singularity & the Syntellect Emergence. This project has been incredibly close to my heartâit dives deep into the unfolding convergence of advanced AI, consciousness, and our collective evolution beyond biology. In this book, I explore the concept of the âIntelligence Supernovaââa coming explosion of synthetic and post-biological intelligence that may soon give rise to a planetary-scale mind, the Syntellect. Itâs a philosophical and scientific journey that challenges you to imagine what lies beyond the Technological Singularity: digital immortality, mind-uploading, the emergence of infomorphs, and the architecture of a conscious Universe. This audiobook is for futurists, technophilosophers, and all curious minds ready to glimpse humanityâs metamorphic future. If youâre drawn to ideas like cybernetic immortality, experiential realism, or the Omega Point Cosmology, I think youâll find this work especially meaningful.
Now available on Amazon: Audible: https://www.audible.com/pd/The-Intelligence-Supernova-Audiobook/B0FGZ3JMPM #IntelligenceSupernova #CyberneticTranshumanism #SimulationSingularity #SyntellectEmergence #SyntellectHypothesis #cybernetics #singularity #transhumanism #posthumanism #AGI #superintelligence
Amazon.com: The Intelligence Supernova: Essays on Cybernetic Transhumanism, The Simulation Singularity & The Syntellect Emergence (Audible Audio Edition): Alex M. Vikoulov, Ecstadelic Media Group, Virtual Voice: Books.
Physicists propose that calculations of certain aspects of quantum gravity can currently be done even without a full theory of quantum gravity itself. Basically, they work backwards from the fact that quantum gravity on the macro scale must conform to Einsteinâs relativity theories. This approach is effective until the small scale of a black hole singularity is close.
(See my Comment below for an article link to POPULAR MECHANICS that discussed the scientific article in an accessible manner.
We study new black-hole solutions in quantum gravity. We use the Vilkovisky-DeWitt unique effective action to obtain quantum gravitational corrections to Einsteinâs equations. In full analogy to previous work done for quadratic gravity, we find new black-holeâlike solutions. We show that these new solutions exist close to the horizon and in the far-field limit.
