Toggle light / dark theme

Ultra-thin 3D display delivers wide-angle, highly-detailed images

Researchers have developed an ultra-thin 3D display with a wide viewing angle, clear image quality and vivid display depth. By overcoming tradeoffs that typically limit glasses-free 3D displays, the advance could open new possibilities for highly detailed interactive experiences in health care, education and entertainment.

“The new display is just 28 mm thick, dramatically slimmer than conventional directional backlight systems, which typically exceed 500 mm,” said research team leader Xu Liu, from Zhejiang University in China. “This level of compactness, combined with the substantial boost in resolution we achieved, represents an important step toward making the technology practical for real-world products.”

In Optica, the researchers demonstrate an ultra-slim 32-inch directional backlight-based prototype based on the new display design. The prototype is roughly the size of a large computer monitor, has a wide viewing angle of over 120° and a large 3D display volume of 28 × 16 × 39 inches.

A Visit From Astronaut Eileen Collins

We had the honor of welcoming Eileen Collins, the first woman to pilot and command a Space Shuttle, to Florida Tech’s campus for a special screening of her new documentary, ‘SPACEWOMAN.’

It was an inspiring evening celebrating perseverance and leadership. Before the event, Collins also met with a small group of students to discuss space exploration and her experiences as a trailblazer in NASA’s history.

Thank you to our campus community and friends of Florida Tech for joining us for this special event!

Learn more about Florida Institute of Technology: https://www.floridatech.edu/

Intro to Nanotechnology with Ralph Merkle | Faculty 101 | Singularity University

Subscribe: http://bit.ly/1Wq6gwm.

Connect with Singularity University:
Website: http://singularityu.org.
Singularity HUB: http://singularityhub.com.
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/singularityu.
Twitter: https://twitter.com/singularityu.
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/singularity-university.
Google+: https://plus.google.com/+singularityu.

About Singularity University:
Singularity University is a benefit corporation headquartered at NASA’s research campus in Silicon Valley. We provide educational programs, innovative partnerships and a startup accelerator to help individuals, businesses, institutions, investors, NGOs and governments understand cutting-edge technologies, and how to utilize these technologies to positively impact billions of people.

Intro to Nanotechnology with Ralph Merkle | Singularity University.
https://www.youtube.com/user/SingularityU

Voting is a stronger determinant of mortality than education: a full-electorate survival analysis with 21-year follow-up

Background Although voting is recognised as a social determinant of health, the association between electoral participation and subsequent mortality at an individual level has not been established.

Objective To assess whether voters and non-voters differ in mortality risk.

Methods We used register-based information on electoral participation in the 1999 parliamentary elections from the full electorate of at least 30-year-old Finnish citizens living in mainland Finland linked to registers containing sociodemographic and mortality information by Statistics Finland. Mortality was assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression models, with follow-up until the end of 2020 (n=3 185 572 individuals; 58 133 493 person-years; 1 053 483 deaths).

An Introduction to Ebolavirus Biology

I wrote this educational primer on ebolavirus as a fun exploration of a topic not related to my current research. While such knowledge may be useful in the event of some future ebolavirus epidemic, it is mostly just an exercise in curiosity and intellectual enrichment. #virology #molecularbiology.

My website version: [ https://logancollinsblog.com/2025/11/04/an-introduction-to-ebolavirus-biology/](https://logancollinsblog.com/2025/11/04/an-introduction-to-ebolavirus-biology/)

Substack version: [ https://loganthrashercollins.substack.com/p/an-introduction-…us-biology](https://loganthrashercollins.substack.com/p/an-introduction-…us-biology)


PDF version: An Introduction to Ebolavirus Biology – Logan Thrasher Collins

I wrote this educational primer as a fun exploration of a topic not related to my current research. While such knowledge may be useful in the event of some future ebolavirus epidemic, it is mostly just an exercise in curiosity and intellectual enrichment. I hope that you too enjoy learning about this fascinating (but scary!) virus as you browse my writeup. Also, if you’re an ebolavirus expert with concepts, edits, and/or ideas to offer, feel free to reach out with your additional insights! Shoutout: I’d like to give a special shoutout/thanks to Jain et al. (reference 4) and Bodmer et al. (reference 2). I used their papers extensively throughout the creation of writeup!

Genome

Reading vs. Playing on a Tablet: Do They have Different Effects on the Brain?

The difference between the brains of children who read books (left picture) and screen time (right picture) over 1 hour. Early childhood, screen time over 60 minutes, are vulnerable to emotional and focus disorders. Increasing the duration of screen time reduces brain connectivity in the language, visual and intelligence centres compared to reading books.


The school bell rang long ago, but Danny is still sitting in his chair, trying to finish copying from the board. “Why is this process so hard? Why does it take me so much longer to read than it takes my friends?” Danny is frustrated. The more he tries to read faster, the harder it is for him to understand what he is reading. Around the time when he finally finishes copying, his friends come back to the class from the break. Like 10–15% of the children in the world, Danny has dyslexia. Dyslexia is defined as difficulty in reading accurately or quickly and, most of the time; it affects the person’s ability to understand what is read and to spell words correctly. The reading difficulty continues into adulthood and does not disappear, even though most adults with dyslexia find ways to “bypass” this difficulty, sometimes using text-to-speech software. Children and adults with dyslexia have different brain activity than do people who are good readers. They have lower activity in the brain area responsible for vision and identification of words [ 1, 2 ] and in another brain area responsible for attention and recognition of errors during reading [ 3 ]. A question could then be asked: is this reading difficulty strange or is it actually the ability to read that is magical? How did the human brain learn to read? And does the daily use of technology, which sometimes “bypasses” the need to make an effort to read, help us to learn to read or make it more difficult? This article will discuss these subjects.

Reading is a relatively new human ability—about 5,000 years old. The Egyptians were among the first to use symbols to represent words within a spoken language, and they used drawings to transmit ideas via writing. As difficult as it is to draw each word in a language, it is still much easier to understand Egyptian hieroglyphs than to figure out what is written in an unfamiliar language. Today, 5,000 years later, we expect each child in first grade to immediately understand that the lines and circles that form letters have a unique sound corresponding to them. To do that, the brain has to rely on neural networks that were designed to perform other tasks, such as seeing, hearing, language comprehension, speech, attention, and concentration [ 4 ] (see Figure 1).

Neuronal hyperactivity and broader tuning linked to altered sound processing in autism model rats

People with autism spectrum disorders commonly have difficulty processing sensory information, which can make busy, bright or loud settings—such as schools, airports and restaurants—stressful or even painful. The neurological causes for altered sound processing are complex, and researchers are interested in better understanding them to make life better for people with autism.

In a study that combines behavioral tests, computer models and electrophysiological recordings of neuron activity, researchers have found that hyperactivity of neurons in the auditory cortex and the reaction of these neurons to an unusually broad range of frequencies contribute to this altered processing in rat models. The research is published in the journal PLOS Biology.

“One of the things we thought wasn’t being looked at enough was this idea of sensory discrimination: being able to distinguish between different features in our environment,” said Benjamin Auerbach, a professor of molecular and integrative physiology at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.

Chimpanzees rationally revise their beliefs

The study, titled “,” was conducted by a large research team that included UC Berkeley Psychology Postdoctoral Researcher Emily Sanford, UC Berkeley Psychology Professor Jan Engelmann and Utrecht University Psychology Professor Hanna Schleihauf. Their findings showed that chimpanzees — like humans — can change their minds based on the strength of available evidence, a key feature of rational thought.

Working at the Ngamba Island Chimpanzee Sanctuary in Uganda, the researchers presented chimps with two boxes, one containing food. Initially, the animals received a clue suggesting which box held the reward. Later, they were given stronger evidence pointing to the other box. The chimps frequently switched their choices in response to the new clues.

“Chimpanzees were able to revise their beliefs when better evidence became available,” said Sanford, who is a researcher in the UC Berkeley Social Origins Lab. “This kind of flexible reasoning is something we often associate with 4-year-old children. It was exciting to show that chimps can do this too.”

To ensure the findings reflected genuine reasoning rather than instinct, the team incorporated tightly controlled experiments and computational modeling. These analyses ruled out simpler explanations, such as the chimps favoring the latest signal (recency bias) or reacting to the most obvious cue. The models confirmed that the chimps’ decision-making aligned with rational strategies of belief revision.

“We recorded their first choice, then their second, and compared whether they revised their beliefs,” Sanford said. “We also used computational models to test how their choices matched up with various reasoning strategies.”

The study challenges the traditional view that rationality — the ability to form and revise beliefs based on evidence — is exclusive to humans.

“The difference between humans and chimpanzees isn’t a categorical leap. It’s more like a continuum,” Sanford said.

/* */