Comments on: Sexuality, Evolution and the Abolition of Aging https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2013/11/sexuality-evolution-and-the-abolition-of-aging Safeguarding Humanity Sat, 07 Dec 2013 19:03:54 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1 By: Marios Kyriazis https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2013/11/sexuality-evolution-and-the-abolition-of-aging#comment-179162 Sat, 07 Dec 2013 19:03:54 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=9129#comment-179162 Artificial reproductive technologies will initially expand and many more people will use them. However, it is the entire reproductive paradigm that will change in radical life extension, with people eventually being less interested in reproduction. Having said that, it is quite likely that only a section of humanity will go along the route of non-reproduction. A sizeable section will most likely stay as they are. Also. it is likely that artificial sexual activities will increase (human-machine interactions), not so much for reproduction, but for sexual pleasure.

]]>
By: bill johnson https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2013/11/sexuality-evolution-and-the-abolition-of-aging#comment-179115 Fri, 06 Dec 2013 06:22:58 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=9129#comment-179115 Great article and certainly very thought provoking. I wonder what role the growing popularity of artificial reproductive technologies have in this argument and if you believe that these methods will continue to grow ever more detached from sexual reproduction?

As a side note I find it highly amusing that the article drew a response from an Answers In Genesis supporter who believes that the earth is only around 6 thousand years old, as their bunk is quite a contrast to your article.

]]>
By: John https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2013/11/sexuality-evolution-and-the-abolition-of-aging#comment-178885 Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:34:45 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=9129#comment-178885 The theory of evolution is factually unsubstantiated. The majority of its given evidences have long been proven false by secular scientists, (transitional fossils, carbon dating, vestigial organs, old earth ect…) or are inapplicable to the theory. Remaining evidences are based on assumptions and wishful thinking. Not science.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-answers#/topic/evolution

http://www.answersingenesis.org / http://www.icr.org / http://www.evolutionvsgod.com

]]>