Comments on: The Kline Directive: Theoretical-Empirical Relationship (Part 3) https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2012/10/the-kline-directive-theoretical-empirical-relationship-part-3 Safeguarding Humanity Mon, 17 Apr 2017 05:27:32 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1 By: Jaylene https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2012/10/the-kline-directive-theoretical-empirical-relationship-part-3#comment-158392 Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:28:34 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=5799#comment-158392 That’s a subtle way of thniknig about it.

]]> By: Benjamin T. Solomon https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2012/10/the-kline-directive-theoretical-empirical-relationship-part-3#comment-156385 Sat, 03 Nov 2012 14:25:31 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=5799#comment-156385 Franky, I pity you. You don’t read all my posts and therefore arrive at an illogical conclusion before asking questions.

]]> By: Benjamin T. Solomon https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2012/10/the-kline-directive-theoretical-empirical-relationship-part-3#comment-156175 Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:47:25 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=5799#comment-156175 FDavies, since you comment on my work without reading it, I give you fair warning, in future I will delete all your comments on my blog posts, whether they sound sensible or not.

]]> By: FDavies https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2012/10/the-kline-directive-theoretical-empirical-relationship-part-3#comment-156071 Fri, 26 Oct 2012 05:33:36 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=5799#comment-156071 Benjamin, how about we make this about your work instead of guessing about me? And by the way, CWU is Central Washington University.

I asked if you knew calculus. …It’s a simple question you can answer with a yes or no. …I’ll also now ask if you have studied logic.

When I first posted the single word comment :nonsense, I meant to say that I did not find what you wrote to make sense. Yes, the stuff you have copied from wikipedia or elsewhere might, but what you were personally saying did not.

Any first year physics or calculus student can come up with Newtons equations to express a falling object, such as a rock dropped from a plane. You have stated that you don’t need to include mass in this, and I have yet to see such an equation which would say how fast the rock falls without including the mass of the rock and the earth.

So how about we act like grown ups and talk about your equations instead of wasting time slamming me for clicking the wrong link?

Or could it be that you don’t have any?

]]> By: Benjamin T. Solomon https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2012/10/the-kline-directive-theoretical-empirical-relationship-part-3#comment-156059 Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:21:27 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=5799#comment-156059 I’d like to thank Lifeboat Foundation for taking the trouble to undelete and unspam all of FDavies comments.

FDavies is just not worth the trouble, he doesn’t know what he is reading, how to navigate a physics journal website correctly, and last of all from what his description of ‘my’ paper, I can only conclude he has read the wrong paper. And he studied where?

]]> By: Benjamin T. Solomon https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2012/10/the-kline-directive-theoretical-empirical-relationship-part-3#comment-155973 Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:48:00 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=5799#comment-155973 FDavies, that is easy for you to say now that you have removed your comments! You are doing what some 3rd world governments do, remove the evidence then claim your are right!

And you have the gall to say that I don’t “have a handle on the math” when you don’t know the difference between an Abstract and a Full Paper. Further you don’t know how to navigate a physics journal website. Is that your idea of an informed and logical discussion on how to get interstellar travel going?

If you don’t know how to read an author’s book I suggest you hold your tongue.

In future I suggest you don’t mess around with comments on this blog.

]]> By: F.Davies https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2012/10/the-kline-directive-theoretical-empirical-relationship-part-3#comment-155965 Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:13:36 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=5799#comment-155965 I wasn’t being rude, but found the replies of Benjamin to be both defensive and just a little rude. As he has not provided a reasonable reply, I am assuming the worst, …that while he can quite from wikipdedia, he really doesn’t have a handle on the math required for an intelligent discussion of the material.

]]> By: Benjamin T. Solomon https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2012/10/the-kline-directive-theoretical-empirical-relationship-part-3#comment-155959 Wed, 24 Oct 2012 06:02:17 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=5799#comment-155959 My previous 3 comments refer to an FDavies who did not appear to make sense of what he was saying. Someone censored FDavies comments to make him appear smarter than his commenting would appear, so I’ve removed his remaining ‘intelligent’ sounding comment.

]]> By: Benjamin T. Solomon https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2012/10/the-kline-directive-theoretical-empirical-relationship-part-3#comment-155883 Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:34:23 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=5799#comment-155883 Who deleted FDavies last comment? By doing so you are providing a misleading picture of the discussion. If I can take other people describing my work as ‘nonsense’ so should you.

]]> By: FDavies https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2012/10/the-kline-directive-theoretical-empirical-relationship-part-3#comment-155850 Mon, 22 Oct 2012 05:32:17 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=5799#comment-155850 Re Calculus: No, I studied it at SWU back in the mid 70’s.
—Now, ‘tit for tat’ & after the fact, I ask you again: Do you know calculus?

Re: Paper: I guess I clicked the wrong link the first time because it was neither an abstract nor paper but a copy of what you have here on another page, similar to how your next posting is again just a copy of something you have posted elsewhere.

Yes, I know the difference, and I’ve read the first 25 pages which you seem to have put together, but found no explanation, no answer to the question I asked previously, before you scolded me for not reading it.

]]>