Comments on: Iran and North Korea’s Nuclear Cooperation https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2007/01/36 Safeguarding Humanity Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:53:28 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1 By: John max https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2007/01/36#comment-12716 Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:37:16 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=36#comment-12716 God bless them!

]]> By: Tom McCabe https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2007/01/36#comment-104 Sat, 03 Feb 2007 01:48:23 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=36#comment-104 This kind of thing comes out every few days now; it’s always conveniently unsourced and heavily loaded with weasel words. It’s the exact same thing we saw in the lead-up to war with Iraq- “Saddam has WMD”, “Saddam sought uranium from Niger”, “Saddam in cahoots with Osama”, “Saddam killed 150,000 Kurds”, “Saddam planned 9/11″, et cetera ad nauseam.

Oh, and if anyone on this board is between the ages of 18 and 35 and is a citizen or permanent resident of the US, you’re now eligible to be drafted (a draft would almost certainly be required in the event of war with Iran, as Iran has four times Iraq’s population and our military is stretched already).

]]> By: Michael Anissimov https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2007/01/36#comment-67 Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:30:11 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=36#comment-67 No, because Iran would still be vulnerable to attack without a developed nuclear program. The time after a first-stage nuclear test would be riskiest for Iran, as another commenter pointed out.

]]> By: randpost https://spanish.lifeboat.com/blog/2007/01/36#comment-64 Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:10:36 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=36#comment-64 It would decrease the risk of war.

]]>